{"id":14516,"date":"2011-11-01T08:27:34","date_gmt":"2011-11-01T12:27:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/?p=14516"},"modified":"2011-11-01T09:30:39","modified_gmt":"2011-11-01T13:30:39","slug":"support-for-pintards-criticism-of-attorneys","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/2011\/11\/support-for-pintards-criticism-of-attorneys","title":{"rendered":"Support For Pintard&#8217;s Criticism of Attorneys"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I would like to comment on an article about a very interesting debate between Free National  Movement (FNM) Senator Michael Pintard and Progressive Liberal Party  (PLP) Senators Hope Strachan and Jerome Fitzgerald in the Senate on  October 27.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that Senator Pintard was well within his rights to  criticize FNM and PLP Parliamentarians for defending known criminals  before our courts. Pintard&#8217;s condemnation was bipartisaned.<\/p>\n<p>He was not seeking to gain political brownie points by attacking PLP  Parliamentarians who are criminal defense attorneys. There are also FNM  Parliamentarians who defend known criminals. Pintard also took a swipe  at FNM Parliamentarians. That is why Opposition members should not seek  to turn this into a political issue.<\/p>\n<p>I am glad that we still have in this country high ranking  government officials who have the courage to call a spade a spade. I  commend the senator for his brutal honesty and audacity.<\/p>\n<p>I also would like to commend the President of the Senate, Lynn Holowesko, for not asking the senator to withdraw his comments.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Jerome Fitzgerald had asked the President to have Pintard withdraw his comments. But I don&#8217;t see why he should have.<\/p>\n<p>Pintard said nothing wrong. Further, Pintard didn&#8217;t even single out  any parliamentarian. Therefore, why were Fitzgerald and Strachan so up  in arms over what the senator said? Senator Holowesko was right when she  stated that what Pintard had said was a general truth. Senator Pintard  only said what most right thinking Bahamians are saying nowadays. For  Fitzgerald and Strachan to take issue with Pintard raises more questions  than answers. Anyone who denies what Pintard had said is either  hopelessly naive or just plain silly.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, I utterly reject Strachan&#8217;s claim that Pintard had  denigrated attorneys by what he had said. How is saying that  Parliamentarians who defend known criminals a denigration of attorneys  or Parliamentarians?<\/p>\n<p>Strachan&#8217;s argument in the Senate made absolutely no sense at all. In  my humble opinion, it was totally devoid of logic. Perhaps the PLP  senator simply wanted to oppose Pintard because of his political  affiliation.<\/p>\n<p>Also, we must all bear in mind that Pintard&#8217;s wife is an attorney.  Therefore, I don&#8217;t believe that it was Pintard&#8217;s intention to defame his  parliamentary colleagues who are attorneys. And even if the senator has  something against Parliamentarians who are attorneys, so what?<\/p>\n<p>Pintard is not the first person to criticize parliamentarians who are  attorneys, nor will he be the last. Besides, the legal profession has  already fallen into disrepute in this country. Every other week it seems  as if an attorney is hauled before the courts for misappropriating  their clients&#8217; money.<\/p>\n<p>The fact of the matter is that everyone who has a little bit of  sense in his country knows that many of the heinous crimes that are  committed in Nassau are committed by chronic offenders who are either  out on bail, or whose attorneys had successfully represented them. No  honest person would deny that even if a Senator or Member of Parliament  does not defend a known criminal, his\/her partners in their law firm  does. Therefore, they are still benefitting from the proceeds of their  law firms; while at the same they are arguing in the House of Assembly  how best to break the proverbial back of crime.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, how can one enact laws to fight crime and then turn around and  defend known criminals who are constantly breaking those laws?<\/p>\n<p>Politicians have been insulting the intelligence of the Bahamian  people for years. This is one reason why I paid very little attention to  the Crime Bill Debate in the House of Assembly. And this is why I take  issue with what the two PLP senators said.<\/p>\n<p>Like many Bahamians, I believe it can be rightfully argued that the  politicians who defend known criminals themselves must bear some of the  blame for the escalating crime crisis that has rocked the very  foundation of Nassau.<\/p>\n<p>I find it utterly amazing that Fitzgerald and Strachan would stand up  in the Senate and defend attorneys at a time like this. They were  simply defending the indefensible. This country has recorded a  staggering 109 murders for the first 10 months of 2011.<\/p>\n<p>Many of these murders were committed by persons who are well-known to the police. Many Bahamians are now wary of attorneys.<\/p>\n<p>That the two PLP Senators would even attempt to challenge what  Pintard had said suggests to me that they are woefully out-of-touch with  the Bahamian people.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, I utterly reject Strachan&#8217;s argument that attorneys must be  dispassionate towards a case. If I were an attorney and I had a strong  hunch that my client was guilty of a crime, I would not insult my God  and my people by defending him. To do so would go against my conscience.<\/p>\n<p>That an attorney would say such a thing might explain why so many  known criminals are always out on the streets terrorizing peaceful,  law-abiding citizens. I wonder if the senator is willing to stand before  a massive audience at a PLP rally and criticize anyone who takes issue  with parliamentarians who defend career felons. I wonder what the  audience&#8217;s response would be. I believe they would boo her right off the  podium.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, I think that it was wrong for Senator Strachan to draw  comparisons between doctors and attorneys in this particular case. If I  were a doctor, I would have no problem treating a cold-blooded murderer  who is either sick or injured. He might be as evil as the former Ugandan  dictator Idi Amin, but he still possesses the image of God. Therefore,  he must be treated with dignity by the physician. Besides, most doctors  take the Hippocratic Oath anyway. Attorneys, on the other hand, should  never represent persons who they know to be bona fide criminals. Never!  Therefore, to make comparisons between doctors and attorneys is like  making comparisons between apples and oranges.<\/p>\n<p>Many residents from New Providence have been impacted in some way,  shape or form by the crime crisis. I had two first cousins who were  brutally murdered in Nassau. Despite what Strachan believes, the  beleaguered people of Nassau could care less about the constitutional  rights of known felons. In fact, I believe that criminals have too many  rights in this country.<\/p>\n<p>Be that as it may, I hope that the good people of the Sea Breeze and  Marathon Constituencies have taken note of what had transpired in the  Senate. I think we have too many attorneys in this country who don&#8217;t  care who they defend. They are too nonchalant about their clients who  they know are career felons. As Pintard said, everybody knows who the  criminals are. New Providence is a very small island. And as the senator  remarked, if you as a parliamentarian don&#8217;t know who the known felons  are, then you have no business leading this country. I couldn&#8217;t have  said it better.<\/p>\n<p>Pintard should continue to sound the alarm on this glaring  hypocrisy in this country. Many decent Bahamians, whether they are PLP,  DNA or FNM, are in full agreement with the courageous senator!<\/p>\n<p>By: Kevin Evans<br \/>\nNassau, Bahamas<br \/>\nOctober, 2011<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I believe that Senator Pintard was well within his rights to criticize FNM and PLP Parliamentarians for defending known criminals before our courts. Pintard&#8217;s condemnation was bipartisaned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":{"facebook_10223285771444175_51037792744":""},"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[93,123,230],"class_list":["post-14516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinions","tag-corruption","tag-lawyers","tag-parliament"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14516\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}