{"id":244122,"date":"2003-10-07T00:02:23","date_gmt":"2003-10-07T04:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/2003\/10\/wreck-commissioner-erred-justice-rules"},"modified":"2003-10-07T00:02:23","modified_gmt":"2003-10-07T04:02:23","slug":"wreck-commissioner-erred-justice-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/2003\/10\/wreck-commissioner-erred-justice-rules","title":{"rendered":"Wreck Commissioner &#8220;Erred&#8221; Justice Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Attorneys for the two vessels involved in the August 2 fatal boating tragedy cleared a major hurdle Friday, after a judicial review of the Wreck Commissioner&#8217;s decision to dismiss the Merchant Shipping (Formal Investigations) Rules from the proceedings was overturned. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>According to Supreme Court Justice Hugh Small, Wreck Commissioner, retired justice Joseph Strachan&#8217;s ruling was flawed.  In his written ruling, Justice Small pointed out that under the Merchant Shipping Act, the formal investigations were adversarial and judicial in nature. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>&#8220;I hold that there is no inconsistency between section 243(3) and the Rules,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The Shipping Act and the Rules contemplated a judicial procedure and I hold that the Commissioner erred when he ruled that the proceedings were stamped with an investigative character.&#8221; <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Justice Small&#8217;s decision was in direct contrast to the Wreck Commissioner&#8217;s ruling September 18, which indicated that the Commission&#8217;s work is only investigative. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>&#8220;I observe that &#8216;under the Act&#8217; must mean under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, and serves to stamp these proceedings with an investigative character. Applying the Rules would replace that with an adversarial character&#8230;.Hence, for the reasons which I have understandably, I trust, briefly tried to make plain, the application fails,&#8221; Justice Strachan said at the time. &#8221; <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Quashing the ruling, Justice Small&#8217;s decision essentially means however that both the Rules, which were drafted under the Merchant Shipping Act and the Act itself should govern the formal investigations, as there were &#8220;no inconsistencies.&#8221; <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>According to lead counsel, Cheryl Grant-Bethel, in such a case, Transport and Aviation Minister, Glenys Hanna-Martin will determine when it is necessary to use either procedure. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>It&#8217;s a decision that marks somewhat of a victory for attorneys who had challenged Justice Strachan&#8217;s ruling on the grounds that it &#8220;contained errors of law.&#8221; The attorneys asserted that the proceedings were &#8220;flawed&#8221; as no notice of investigation was served on persons whom the Minister deemed to be parties. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Leading the challenge, attorney for the United Star, Charles Mackay, pointed out that the &#8220;notice of investigation is the foundation on which a formal investigation rests and if none exists, the investigation cannot proceed.&#8221; <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Mr. Mackay also highlighted the provisions of Rule 7(6) which established the right of parties to cross-examine witnesses called on the Minister&#8217;s behalf. It also gave leeway for parties to call their own witnesses and rebut. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>The attorneys also generally felt however that the Act gave the Commissioner broad sweeping powers to make his own rules on how the proceedings should be conducted. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>The adoption of both sets of provisions mean several things, according to Justice Small&#8217;s ruling. It means that in keeping the Rules, parties to the proceedings should be served at least 30 days notice, that these parties could confront the testimony of witnesses through cross-examination and produce contrasting evidence. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>&#8220;We will now probably have to sit down and figure out who are parties, who might be people charged at the end of the day,&#8221; Mrs. Grant-Bethel pointed out to the Bahama Journal Friday. &#8220;We were trying to avoid doing that because we were trying to keep it impartial, so that a determination would not be made upfront as to <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>who may be liable at the end of the day.&#8221; <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Mrs. Grant-Bethel had submitted that there was a conflict between the Merchant Shipping Rules and the sections 9 to 13 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, which is also adopted as part of the Merchant Shipping Act. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>But Justice Small&#8217;s ruling makes it clear. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Minister Hanna-Martin appointed the Wreck Commission to investigate the collision of Bahamian registered vessels, barge, the United Star and mailboat, Sea Hauler on August 2. The impact caused a hydraulic crane to careen to the mailboat&#8217;s deck, crushing four persons to death. Dozens others were injured. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>There was no indication when the formal investigation would resume. However one attorney in the matter told the Bahama Journal Friday that because the Merchant Shipping Rules mandate a 30-day notice for parties, it may be at least another month before the proceedings begin. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>To date, none of the 80 witnesses have been called. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Appearing for the M\/V United Star are attorneys, Charles Mackay, Kendal Wright, Raphael Moxey and Renae Mackay. Attorney John Deal appears for the Sea Hauler. <\/P><\/p>\n<p><P><B>By Macushla Pinder, The Bahama Journal<\/B><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to Supreme Court Justice Hugh Small, Wreck Commissioner, retired justice Joseph Strachan&#8217;s ruling was flawed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"initial","rop_publish_now_accounts":{"facebook_10223285771444175_51037792744":""},"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-244122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-headlines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bahamasb2b.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}